Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

369 F. App'x 850

United States v. Muhammad

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-03-05

Relies on Anders v. California · Penson v. Ohio

Decided 2010-03-05

                                                                           FILED
                             NOT FOR PUBLICATION                            MAR 05 2010

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                     U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS




                             FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                       No. 07-10605

               Plaintiff - Appellee,             D.C. No. CR-02-40206-DLJ

   v.
                                                 MEMORANDUM *
 GODLIFE ASAD MUHAMMAD, a.k.a.
 Godlife Muhammad, Kiven Ross,

               Defendant - Appellant.



                     Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Northern District of California
                     D. Lowell Jensen, District Judge, Presiding

                            Submitted February 16, 2010 …


Before:        FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

        Godlife Asad Muhammad appeals from the 108-month sentence imposed

upon remand for resentencing. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738

          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          …
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

DRS/Research
(1967), Muhammad’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

       Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 
488 U.S. 75, 80-81
 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

       Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.




DRS/Research                              2                                    07-10605

/369/fappx/850 · .json · Public domain