369 F. Supp. 2d 376 - Gonzalez-Pena v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Bagley · Coleman v. Thompson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Petitioner's] chain of custody argument presents a question of State evidentiary law that generally is not amendable to habeas review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Torres v. O'Meara“'so extremely unfair that its admission violates fundamental conceptions of justice.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Torres v. O'Meara
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.