369 F. Supp. 2d 502 - Hanif v. Gantner’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1361 (§ 291 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Heckler v. Ringer · Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn. · Hilton v. Braunskill · Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc. · Makarova v. United States
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.