369 Ill. App. 3d 441 - People v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2025
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · 106 Ill. 2d 237 - People v. Collins · 171 Ill. 2d 475 - People v. Washington · 193 Ill. 2d 413 - People v. Malchow · Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Challenges based on procedural due process focus on the procedures employed by a statute and whether the statute provides an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires that a person in danger of serious loss of life, liberty or property be given notice of the case against him and opportunity to meet it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The first step in a procedural due process challenge is to determine whether an individual has been deprived of life or a protected liberty or property interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re TC
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.