King v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

10 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he United States Supreme Court has issued two important opinions on the use of state law to set aside an arbitration agreement when that agreement is governed by the FAA: AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion , [ 563 U.S. 333 , 131 S.Ct. 1740 ], 179 L. Ed. 2d 742 (2011) (determining that the FAA preempted California's judicial rule prohibiting class waivers in consumer arbitration agreements contained within contracts of adhesion) and American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Rest. [ 570 U.S. 228 , 133 S.Ct. 2304 ], 186 L. Ed. 2d 417 (2013) (holding that the FAA does not permit courts to invalidate an arbitration agreement on the grounds that it does not permit class arbitration).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 265 N.C. App. 681 - Wygand v. Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Ams.

2. “[c]ourts of equity have carefully refrained from defining the particular instances of fiduciary relations in such a manner that other and perhaps new cases might be excluded.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 264 N.C. App. 350 - Hager v. Smithfield E. Health Holdings, LLC

3. “Before he even saw Dr. Bryant, Mr. King demonstrated sufficient trust and confidence in him to provide Dr. Bryant with confidential medical information.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 264 N.C. App. 350 - Hager v. Smithfield E. Health Holdings, LLC