369 N.J. Super. 291 - State v. PL’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Thomas · State v. Heitzman · 209 N.J. Super. 617 - State v. Heitzman · 344 N.J. Super. 83 - Casey v. Brennan · Casey v. Brennan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the language in N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2c is clear and unambiguous. Accordingly, it is unnecessary for us to look beyond the statute's literal terms in order to ascertain its meaning, [ Id. at 293, 848 A. 2d 861 (citing State v. Thomas, 166 N.J. 560 , 767 A. 2d 459 (2001)).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“with intent to manufacture, distribute or dispense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is defined more broadly. The statute defines”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.