Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 NW2D 140 - State v. Bell

State v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2021

6 state decisions

3019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manning v. United States · State v. Elder · Application of Jerrel · State v. Burkman · State v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] judge in such proceeding need not have evidence that would establish beyond a reasonable doubt guilt of criminal offenses. All that is required is that the evidence and facts be such as to reasonably satisfy the judge that the conduct of the probationer has not been as good as required by the conditions of probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.