Hereden v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““However should the petitioner seek relief by way of habeas corpus ad pros-equendum, he must tender sufficient money to defray the expense involved in transporting his person from the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, to the place where the hearing on such application is to be held and back to the Federal Penitentiary at Leavenworth, for as the Court stated in Application of Melton for Writ of Mandamus, Okl.Cr., 342 P.2d 571 : “ ‘The state is not required to assume the additional burden of cost incident to affording a speedy trial, i. e., in returning an accused to the state, who, on his own volition placed himself beyond the' jurisdiction of the state and in the custody of the Federal Government. The costs incident to returning the accused from Leavenworth, Kansas, ■ after the completion of his sentence and in response to the hold order are just and reasonable, but to require the additional burden of a round trip excursion into Oklahoma under the conditions herewith presented would be an unjust burden on the state. The state is in no way responsible for the accused’s predicament and is in no manner required to extend the hand of charity to him.’ “For the reasons herein set forth, the Writ of Mandamus.is denied and the action is dismissed.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Auten v. State