Horany v. Paris’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1983
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Ah Len · 7 Okla. Crim. 590 - Watson v. State · Harrod v. Sanders · Carlston v. Shenson · Raefeldt v. Koenig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the trial of a jury case, when an attorney repeatedly and persistently asks improper and prejudicial questions which have for their obvious purpose a desire to cast reflections upon the character of a witness or a party, rebukes of counsel by the trial court, and admonitions to the jury to disregard the improper utterances, cannot be held to cure the injury resulting from the action, and such conduct constitutes reversible error.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Where in a jury trial an attorney deliberately injects into the case highly improper questions which have for their only purpose reflections upon the character of the witness, mild rebukes of counsel guilty of such prejudicial conduct cannot be held to cure the injury resulting from such action, and such action constitutes reversible error.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.