Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 P2D 890 - Clay v. Sandal

Clay v. Sandal’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2004

1 district · 6 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Christman v. Salway · 6 Utah 2d 226 - Buehner Block Company v. Glezos · Katz v. Obenchain · Mason v. Rolando Lumber Co. · Paget v. Peters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellants argue that the allegedly non-lienable items were comminged with lienable items and this caused the entire lien to fall. Of course, we have already decided that the two items were lienable. But even if they were non-lienable there would be no merit to appellants’ argument. The two items were not commingled, or joined or mixed, with other items of the claim. They were set out in the claim of lien as separate numbered items with the amount claimed for each item individually shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The lien notice and pleadings may be amended at any time before judgment. If a material statement * * * is omitted or misstated, this is ground for a reasonable delay or continuance to enable opposing parties to meet the amendment, and no non-suit or dismissal may be entertained in the action except upon the merits of the cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A contractor may recover upon a lien filed by him only the amount due to him according to the terms of his contract, after deducting all claims of other persons for work done and materials furnished.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.