People v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Frank D. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Vincent Joseph SPOTO · Hagos v. People · Domingo-Gomez v. People · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Russell S. RATH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the superfluous language. See Weeks , ¶ 59 . Thus, we conclude that the inclusion of this language did not so undermine the fundamental fairness of the trial as to cast serious doubt on the reliability of the judgment of conviction. IV. Admission of Hearsay Evidence was not Plain Error ¶ 26 Caime argues that the trial court erroneously allowed the prosecution's fingerprint expert to testify at the habitual sentencing proceeding that her report was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.