Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 Pa. 523 - King Will

King Will’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Masciantonio Will (1958), Williams v. McCarroll (1953)

36 state decisions

1601952196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leedom v. Palmer · Null's Estate · Phillips' Estate · Ash Will · Lawrence's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[0]ne may be physically weak but have a perfectly sound and strong mind. So long as the mind, like the captain of a stricken ship, is free to dictate direction and course, its decision will not be questioned in law even though the body be crippled with pain and the spirit awry with torment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Nor is the burden of proof placed upon a legatee, in the case of a confidential relation, unless it be shown that he was instrumental in procuring the legacy. Where there is no evidence that the beneficiary solicited the bequest herself or wrote the will or procured it to be written, or that her advice was sought or taken, the existence of intimate friendly relations between the testatrix and beneficiary, such as living with her, nursing her and managing her business do not import undue influence or shift the burden of proof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.