369 Pa. Super. 84 - Laub v. Zaslavsky’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2013
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6402 · 42 U.S.C. § 664 (§ 464 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sorenson v. Secretary of the Treasury · Presley v. Regan · 619 F. Supp. 825 - Smith v. Onondaga County Support Collection Unit · 634 F. Supp. 598 - Rucker v. Secretary of Treasury of United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the federal intercept program does not encompass situations where a parent has continually complied with his child support obligation, but where, nonetheless, arrearages are created as a result of the retroactive effect of [a modified] order of support.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he primary purpose of the federal income tax refund intercept program is not to regulate or punish the parent's conduct. Rather, the objective of the program is to ensure that a child who is entitled to financial support from his parent in fact receives that support.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In Re RCT“the amount of a delinquency, determined under a court order, ... for support and maintenance of a child, or of a child and the parent with whom the child is living.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.