Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 SO2D 620 - Shanklin v. State

Shanklin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1998

19 state decisions

140197919801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 365 So. 2d 1067 - Coxon v. State · 268 So. 2d 173 - Pope v. State · Tracey v. State · 46 So. 2d 453 - Sinclair v. State · 338 So. 2d 1335 - Tuff v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On the same rationale, we hold that appellant's plea of guilty to the crime of battery of a law enforcement officer, after the state had properly laid a factual basis, constituted a tacit amendment of the information to properly charge that offense. Once the information is deemed to have been amended, jurisdiction is no longer a problem, and the judgment cannot be collaterally attacked. The same result could not have occurred in . . (cases involving jury verdicts), because there were no guilty pleas.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`unlawfully and intentionally touch or strike a law enforcement officer... .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.