Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 So. 2d 928 - Foster v. State

369 So. 2d 928 - Foster v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2011 · most notably LeDuc v. Florida (1979), 525 So. 2d 833 - Grossman v. State (1988)

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

28019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Proffitt v. Florida · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · 303 So. 2d 632 - Sullivan v. State · 229 So. 2d 855 - Paramore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he current position of this Court is that allegedly gruesome and inflammatory photographs are admissible into evidence if relevant to any issue required to be proven in a case. Relevancy is to be determined in the normal manner, that is, without regard to any special characterization of the proffered evidence. Under this conception, the issues of "whether cumulative", or "whether photographed away from the scene," are routine issues basic to a determination of relevancy, and not issues arising from any "exceptional nature" of the proffered evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An elderly gentleman had agreed to go out and have some fun, but the price of such activity was his life. Defendant showed no compassion when he cut the victim's throat, beat him, dragged him into the woods, and cut his spine with a knife. As described by one witness, there was no air coming from the body of the victim after she heard”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] defendant cannot, by stipulating as to the identity of a victim and the cause of death, relieve the State of its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.