Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 SW2D 36 - Garza v. State

Garza v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
7
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 1984

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

100196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dickerson · 168 F. Supp. 899 - United States v. Dickerson · In Re Poff · 171 Tex. Crim. 425 - Hultin v. State · Trimble v. Stone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the present case it is undisputed that the appellant’s conviction for murder is for the same act and offense for which he was, upon petition of the district attorney, adjudged a delinquent child and confined in the state school for boys. Under such facts, the conviction does violate the principles of fundamental fairness and constitutes a deprivation of due process and equal protection of the law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A juvenile cannot `be adjudged a delinquent child and held in custody as such, and, without regard to how he may respond to the guidance and control afforded him under the [Texas] Juvenile Act, be indicted, tried, and convicted of the identical offense after he reaches the age of 17.' Garza v. State, (Tex.Cr.App.1963) 369 S.W.2d 36, 39.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.