Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 SW3D 205 - Doan, Ex Parte Dustin

Doan, Ex Parte Dustin’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Dowling v. United States · United States v. Wheeler · Richardson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This Court granted review on a single ground: The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Brazos County Attorney and the Travis County Attorney were not the same parties for collateral estoppel purposes.” Id. at 213 (Johnson, J., concurring) (emphasis added). Likewise, Justice Womack, whose writing has guided the court of criminal appeals’ treatment of this topic, has stated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If jeopardy has not attached, then no aspect of double jeopardy, including its collateral-estoppel component, is implicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Without a first incidence of jeopardy, the probationer cannot be in 'double' jeopardy at a subsequent criminal trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.