Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 SW3D 52 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grim · State v. Barnum · State v. Anderson · State v. Jones · State v. Biggs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “-were not defined for the jury. In considering the facts of this case, an ordinary juror would see no distinction between the two terms and would treat them as functionally equivalent. In ordinary language, when we think of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person is responsible for his own conduct and he is also responsible for the conduct of another person in committing an offense if he acts with the other person with the common purpose of committing that offense or if, for the purpose of committing that offense, he aids or encourages the other person in committing it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the other man's assault on the victim. Given the facts of this case, we have no reason to believe that the jurors drew such a fine legal distinction between the terms”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.