Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

369 S.W.3d 764

Favell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-05-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-05-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Jerome Favell (Movant), acting pro se, claims the Circuit Court of Marion County erred in denying his motion requesting reduction of sentence.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/369/sw3d/764 · .json · Public domain