Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

369 S.W.3d 87

State v. Anderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 2012

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2012-06-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2018

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-06-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2James Anderson appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of murder in the first degree, pursuant to Section 565.020 RSMo 2000. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/369/sw3d/87 · .json · Public domain