Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 U.S. 38 - Simonson v. Granquist

Simonson v. Granquist’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

295
cited by 295 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

74 federal appellate · 23 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 295 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Nicholas v. United States (1966), United States v. Speers (1966)

74 federal appellate · 23 district · 9 state decisions

8701962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSimonson v. Granquist (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104 · 11 U.S.C. § 107 · 26 U.S.C. § 6321 (Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966)

Relies on Gardner v. State of New Jersey · United States v. Childs · Goggin v. Division of Labor Law Enforcement · International Typographical Union v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 295 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “broad aim of the Act to provide for the conservation of the estates of insolvents to the end that there may be as equitable a distribution of assets as is consistent with the type of claims involved.”
    22 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(d)ebts owing to the United States ... as a penalty or forfeiture ... except for the amount of the pecuniary loss sustained by the act, transaction, or proceeding out of which the penalty or forfeiture arose.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We cannot agree with the suggestion that the label placed upon an imposition in a revenue measure is decisive in determining its character____ We disagree, too, with the conclusion that a tax under the Constitution cannot be a penalty. Section 57j places penalties in a category quite different from debts, and the character of a penalty cannot be changed by calling it a tax. The words of the statute precisely reveal the purpose of Congress not to exercise its sovereign right to a claim against a bankrupt except to the extent that there has been a pecuniary loss.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.