Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 U.S. 643 - Malone v. Bowdoin

Malone v. Bowdoin’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

809
cited by 809 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

322 federal appellate · 105 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 809 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2024 · most notably Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman (1984), Dugan v. Rank (1963)

322 federal appellate · 105 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 10 states

33001962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBowdoin v. Malone (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1442 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491

Relies on Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp. · Land US v. Dollar · United States v. Causby · United States v. Lee · Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 809 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he action of a federal officer affecting property claimed by a plaintiff can be made the basis of a suit for specific relief against the officer as an individual only if the officer's action is 'not within the officer's statutory powers or, if within those powers, only if the powers, or their exercise in the particular case, are constitutionally void.'”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to reconcile completely all the decisions of the Court in this field prior to 1949 would be a Procrustean task,”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “continuing vitality only `where there is a claim that the holding constitutes an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.