Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 U.S. 749 - Russell v. United States

Russell v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

2,959
cited by 2,959 later decisions
34
cited 34 times by the Supreme Court
43
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

1,512 federal appellate · 232 district · 474 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 2,959 later decisions (34 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2025 · most notably Gault (1967), Hamling v. United States (1974)

1,512 federal appellate · 232 district · 474 state decisions — followed in 43 states

65201962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Berger v. United States · Morissette v. United States · Roth v. United States · Costello v. United States · Stirone v. United States

Cited together with Hartman v. United States · Hamling v. United States · Stirone v. United States · United States v. Debrow · Bain Jr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2,959 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contains the elements of the offense intended to be charged, 'and sufficiently apprises the defendant of what he must be prepared to meet,'”
    263 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “identify the subject under congressional subcommittee inquiry”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an indictment performs two significant and constitutionally based functions. First, it must inform the accused of the “nature and cause of the accusation,” and, secondly, ... must serve as a guide by which it may be determined whether, if subsequently charged, a person is twice placed in jeopardy for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.