Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 369 WIS2D 225 - State v. Richard J. Sulla

State v. Richard J. Sulla’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

49 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Wasman v. United States · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley · State v. Gallion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise a question of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may in the exercise of its legal discretion deny the motion without a hearing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even a properly pled motion ... without holding an evidentiary hearing if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “A hearing on a postconviction motion is required only when the movant states sufficient material facts that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.