Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 A.D.2d 531

In re Arroyo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1971-06-10

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-06-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1996

3 state decisions

20197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Orders, Family Court of the State of New York, New York County, entered on February 5,1971, determining neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Order of said court entered on February 16, 1971, placing for adoption the child, Diana Carmen Arroyo, without her mother’s consent, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter remanded to the Family Court for further proceedings, in accordance herewith. The Trial Judge, faced with a sad and sordid situation, commendably tried in every way to do what she believed was best for the unfortunate infants, who are the subjects of these proceedings. It is for this reason, and because of the overwhelming proof in the record, that we affirm the orders and findings of neglect, even though there was a technical error on her part in proceeding with the hearing after she had had access to the probation reports in violation of subdivision (b) of section 1047 of the Family Court Act. The court’s order placing Diana for adoption without her mother’s consent and without a dispositional hearing, by making use of section 111 of the Domestic Relations Law, is unauthorized and invalid. It would appear that this procedure can be followed only after an adoption petition is filed. Concur—'Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, MeGivern, Tilzer and Macken, JJ.

/37/ad2d/531 · .json · Public domain