Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 ALAAPP 232 - Cole v. State

Cole v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2003

8 state decisions

40195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Davis · Kossakowski v. People · Hopkins v. State · Dix v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When an offense is committed partly in one county and partly in another or the acts or effects thereof constituting or requisite to the consummation of the offense occur in two or more counties, venue is in either county.” (Emphasis supplied)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was properly in the county where the accused was under obligation to account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.