Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Ala. App. 96 - Holloway v. State

37 Ala. App. 96 - Holloway v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently November 1985 · most notably 402 So. 2d 1088 - Flowers v. State (1981), 38 Ala. App. 39 - Gayden v. State (1954)

75 state decisions

3201952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. State · Berry v. State · Whitehead v. State · 33 Ala. App. 451 - Jones v. State · Johnson v. Louisville N. R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he seller was thereby deceived. . . .”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The mere fact that a tendered written instruction is copied from an opinion of an appellate court does not assure its acceptability. Britling Cafeteria Co. v. Irwin, 229 Ala. 687 , 159 So. 228 ; Maxwell v. State, 32 Ala.App. 487 , 27 So.2d 804 . “The charge in question is not hypothesized on the evidence. It is merely a statement of a legal principle without any instruction as to the effect upon or application to the issues in the case. Edwards v. State, 205 Ala. 160 , 87 So. 179 ; Johnson v. Louisville & N. R. Co., 220 Ala. 649 , 127 So. 216 ; Thomas v. State, 34 Ala.App. 470 , 41 So.2d 435 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.