Browning v. Navarro’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2006
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 704 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 959
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Holtkamp v. Littlefield · Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation v. Hall · Holloway v. Browning · Browning v. Holloway
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the event that the BROWNING INTERESTS and Debtors [Humble and Holloway] are unable to obtain the assignment of [the 1979 case to a visiting or retired state judge], the remand ... shall not take effect and the Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction over said cause which shall proceed to trial in the Bankruptcy Court before a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Browning v. Navarro“the automatic stay provisions of section 362 of the Bankruptcy Code are modified so as to permit the remand of [the 1979 case] and the trial of same pursuant to the terms of the annexed Stipulation and Agreement as amended.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Browning v. Navarro“[o]n request of a party in interest and after notice and a hearing, the court shall grant relief from the [automatic] stay ... by terminating, annulling, modifying, or conditioning such stay ... for cause ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Browning v. Navarro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.