In Re Barton’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 7 U.S.C. § 1308
Relies on In the Matter of William Guy Munger, Bankrupt. Ernest J. Pombo v. Jack A. Ulrich, Trustee · 95 Wash. 2d 853 - City of Everett v. Estate of Sumstad · 15 Wash. App. 238 - Bank of the West v. Wes-Con Development Co. · In Re Preisser · 26 Wash. App. 742 - City of Everett v. Estate of Sumstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Payments in kind are intended to compensate producers who have reduced their acreages which would have otherwise been planted to the 1983 crops.... Accordingly, quantities of these commodities which are made available as payment-in-kind are considered to be 1983 production. 8”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.