People v. Chambers’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
2 district · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably 19 Cal. 4th 26 - Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. (1998), 14 Cal. 3d 199 - City of Los Angeles v. City of San Fernando (1975)
2 district · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 488 - Routh v. Quinn · People v. California Fish Co. · 15 Cal. 2d 1 - Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles · City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co. · Holland v. Hotchkiss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] proceeding based on alleged invalidity or irregularity of any proceedings instituted under [Revenue and Taxation Code section 3691 et seq.] can only be commenced within one year after the date of execution of the tax collector's deed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he limitations prescribed in this chapter apply to actions brought in the name of the state or county or for the benefit of the state or county, in the same manner as to actions by private parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.