Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Cal. 2d 568 - In Re Kimler

37 Cal. 2d 568 - In Re Kimler’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
April 1993
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 1993 · most notably In Re Schoengarth (1967), Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert Inn (1955)

28 state decisions

8019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holman Drew v. Harry Kendall Thaw · 17 Cal. 2d 108 - Biewend v. Biewend · In re Strauss · Johnson v. Matthews · People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Bartley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The judgment [of habeas corpus] declared that `... no sufficient cause for the detention of said petitioner appearing, it is ordered ... that the Writ of Habeas Corpus be sustained and made permanent, and that the petitioner ... be ... discharged from imprisonment and detention for the cause aforesaid.' (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The discharge of Kimler in Missouri must be treated as res judicata on the issue above mentioned, that is, that there is no longer any basis for California to imprison Kimler arising from his conviction here, and therefore he is entitled to a discharge in this proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the clear language of the Missouri judgment, the only fact determined was that the `facts and circumstances are not sufficient to justify extradition.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.