Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Cal. 3d 841 - People v. O'BRYAN

37 Cal. 3d 841 - People v. O'BRYAN’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 2 Cal. 5th 858 - People v. Gonzales (2017), United States v. Aguila-Montes De Oca (2011)

3 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

5701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 37 Cal. 3d 826 - People v. Jackson · 1 Cal. 3d 431 - People v. Wilson · 23 Cal. 3d 103 - People v. Teron · 16 Cal. 3d 465 - March Fong Eu v. Chacon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Any person convicted of a serious felony who previously has been convicted of a serious felony in this state ... shall receive, in addition to the sentence imposed by the court for the present offense, a five-year enhancement for each such prior conviction on charges brought and tried separately. The terms of the present offense and each enhancement shall run consecutively.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not only dwelling houses and trailer coaches but also `the inhabited portion of any other building.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the inhabited portion of any other building”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.