37 Cal. 4th 168 - People v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
197
cited by 197 later decisions
3
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 190 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Batson v. Kentucky · Blakely v. Washington · Gregg v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 197 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Miller-El [II] thus did not consider whether an appellate court must conduct a comparative juror analysis in the first instance, when the objector has failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination, or whether an appellate court must conduct a comparative juror analysis for the first time on appeal, when the objector failed to do so at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boyd v. Newland“where equivocal or conflicting responses are elicited regarding a prospective juror's ability to impose the death penalty, the trial court's determination as to his true state of mind is binding on an appellate court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In light of her equivocal answers on voir dire, we defer to the trial court's implicit determination regarding Juror C.B.'s state of mind and conclude substantial evidence supports the court's ruling ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.