Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 Cal. App. 682

174 P 687

People v. Pimentel

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1918

California Court of Appeal · decided 1918-06-27

<p>APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. D. M. Young, Judge.</p> <p>The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>

Decided 1918-06-27

THE COURT.

¶1The defendant was convicted of robbery, and from the judgment and the order denying Ms motion for a hew trial he brings this appeal.

¶2No appearance in Ms behalf has been made in this court and we have been furnished with no statement of any reason for disturbing the verdict found against the defendant.

¶3Of course, the presumption is that no prejudicial error was committed and that the verdict is amply supported. We may add that we have sufficiently examined the record to be convinced that the defendant was justly convicted.

¶4The judgment and order are affirmed.

/37/calapp/682 · .json · Public domain