Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Cal. App. 735 - Ravn v. Planz

37 Cal. App. 735 - Ravn v. Planz’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 1991 · most notably 54 Cal. 3d 288 - Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (1991), Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior Court (1923)

26 state decisions

70191819201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Romero v. Snyder · Larkin v. Superior Court · 35 Cal. App. 264 - Mazitelli v. Crane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The provision of section 583 above set forth is mandatory. (Citing authorities.) The circumstance, therefore, that the trial of the cause was postponed several times without plaintiff’s consent, one of those occasions being a relatively short time before the date when the defendant would be entitled to require the court to dismiss the action, is a matter of no significance. Courts are, of course, loath to deny to a litigant a trial upon the merits; but the section of the Code of Civil Procedure above recited, directs in plain terms that it shall be done when a case falls within the conditions stated; and the present is such a case. The trial court had no discretion. The motion being made, its duty was to dismiss. To relax the rule to cover hard cases would be to set at naught the express will of the legislature.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.