37 Cal. App. 2d 656 - Ray v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1966
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on County of San Bernardino v. County of Riverside · Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co. · Shaver v. Tunstead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . he accepted the stock thus issued and that, after knowledge of the sale and issuance of the stock to King, he participated in the stockholders’ meeting and voted his stock and thereafter acted as a director of the corporation, having been elected such through the use of the stock issued to him. in conformance with the decree. Having thus accepted the benefits of the decree and having received all that the evidence shows he was entitled to receive, he is not in a position to appeal from the judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Levine v. Chandler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.