Hardy v. Stumpf’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably 5 Cal. 4th 1050 - Cassista v. Community Foods, Inc. (1993), 457 F. Supp. 612 - United States v. City of Buffalo (1978)
5 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Frontiero v. Richardson · 5 Cal. 3d 1 - Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby · 2 Cal. 3d 765 - Westbrook v. Mihaly · Bradwell v. The State · Castro v. Beecher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Indeed, California courts have expressly stated that a writ of mandate is an appropriate remedy for the enforcement of a civil right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davenport v. Campoy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.