Layport v. Rieder’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2018
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ex parte McNulty · 72 Cal. App. 249 - Firpo v. Murphy · Taylor v. Budd · 126 Cal. App. 677 - Herkner v. Rubin · Scheafer v. Herman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“graduate[s] the punishment according to the [more serious] consequences of the forbidden act....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Lobaugh“too trifling to be considered as grounds for requiring a trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.