Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 CALAPPSUPP2D 753 - People v. Garcia

People v. Garcia’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1960
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1960

5 state decisions

301939194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · Schneider v. State · Near v. State of Minnesota Olson · Ala Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States · Lovell v. City of Griffin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As we said in People v. Zimbrolt, (1939) 35 Cal.App.2d Supp. 745, 747 [ 91 P.2d 252 ], ‘ Crimes are not to be “built up by courts with the aid of inference, implication, and strained interpretation” (Ex parte McNulty, [1888] 77 Cal. 164, 168 [ 19 P. 237 , 11 Am.St.Rep. 257 ]), and “penal statutes must be construed to reach no further than their words; no person can be made subject to them by implication.” (Ex parte Twing, [1922] 188 Cal. 261 . 265 [ 204 P. 1082 ].) ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.