Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 CONNAPP 708 - Fraulo v. Gabelli

Fraulo v. Gabelli’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Scinto v. Sosin (1998), Exley v. Connecticut Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc. (2000)

25 state decisions

170199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of Manchester · Garrity v. McCaskey · Soares v. Vestal · O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3 · Bic Pen Corporation v. Local No. 134

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The authority of an arbitrator to adjudicate the controversy is limited only if the agreement contains express language restricting the breadth of issues, reserving explicit rights, or conditioning the award on court review. In the absence of any such qualifications, an agreement is unrestricted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]n award need contain no more than the actual decision of the arbitrators. An explanation of the means by which they reached the award, unless required by the submission, is needless and superfluous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In determining whether a submission is unrestricted [the court] look[s] at the authority of the arbitrator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.