Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 Conn. Super. Ct. 786 - Moody v. Pinto

37 Conn. Super. Ct. 786 - Moody v. Pinto’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
December 1985
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Newell · State v. Orsini · Sydleman v. Beckwith · MacLaren v. Bishop · State v. Horwitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has been widely held that the state of pregnancy is such a common condition that a woman may give her opinion that she herself is pregnant. ... We see no reason not to extend the rule to allow her to testify to the date when she became pregnant if her opinion is based entirely upon facts within her direct knowledge[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.