Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 F.1d 191 - Bliss v. United States

Bliss v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

37 F. 191 · 1889

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
August 1917
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Valentine v. Stewart · Dooley v. City of Kansas · Duncan v. Holcomb · Bliss v. United States · Wilson v. Mower

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘The law does not allow an attorney to stipulate with an opposing party for the payment of his fees, in whole or in part, unless he acts with the knowledge and consent of his client.” Bliss v. United States (C. C.) 37 Fed. 191 , 195.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.