Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 F.1d 327 - In re Chapman

In re Chapman’s Empirical Analysis

37 F. 327 · 1889

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1913
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1913

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

201889189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Davison · State v. Dimick · Commonwealth v. Cushing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a well-settled doctrine of every system of jurisprudence that whatever is done in contravention of prohibitory law is null and void. I think that, in accordance with this principle, the enlistment of a minor without the written' consent of his parent or guardian, if he has one entitled to his services and control, is invalid, and of no legal effect; and, on principle and authority, that tire invalidity may be claimed by the minor himself before or after attaining majority, or by any person entitled to his control or services.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.