Manly v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.2d 212 · 1930
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2018
3 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 104
Relies on Guarantee Title Trust Company v. Title Guaranty & Surety Company · Marshall v. People of State of New York · Globe Bank & Trust Co. of Paducah v. Martin · Henderson v. Samuel Mayer · In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The debts to have priority * * * shall be * * * (2) wages not to exceed $600 to each claimant, which have been earned within three months before the date of the commencement of the proceeding, due to workmen ‡ ‡ s]< ff”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“unreasonable to think that in such case Congress could have intended to deny priority to wage claimants, who had been delayed in the collection of their claims by the insolvency proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Spinks“the commencement of proceedings in insolvency resulting in bankruptcy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Spinks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.