Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 F.2d 328 - Everett v. Warfield Mining Co.

Everett v. Warfield Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis

37 F.2d 328 · 1930

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
September 1990
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently September 1990

14 federal appellate ·

801930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grant v. National Bank · Stucky v. Masonic Savings Bank · Kennard v. Behrer · Rutland County Nat. Bank v. Graves · Manly v. Southern Supply Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A creditor may feel anxious about his claim and have a strong desire to secure it or have it paid, and yet not have such belief as the act requires. Obtaining additional security or receiving payment of a debt under such circumstances is not prohibited by law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.