In re Hurley’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.2d 397 · 1930
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
November 1931
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Since 1879, so far as disclosed by reported cases, the Department of Internal Revenue of the United States has not availed itself of this statute to seize personal property other than the contraband goods, except in the ease of a distillery or manufactory of some kind.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“raw materials found in the possession of any person intending to manufacture the same into articles of a kind subject to tax,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for the purpose of being sold or removed by him in fraud of the internal revenue laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.