Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 37 F.2d 557 - Ross v. United States

Ross v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

37 F.2d 557 · 1930

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1933
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 27 U.S.C. § 91

Relies on Wayman v. Southard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Provided, that it is the intent of Congress that the court, in imposing sentence hereunder, should discriminate between casual or slight violations and habitual sales of intoxicating liquor, or attempts to commercialize violations of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.