Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 F.2d 93

Docket No. 5825.

Royal Indemnity Co. v. Abrams

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1929.

Rehearing Denied January 28, 1930.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-12-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 1935

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Royal Indemnity Co. v. Morris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Ford & Johnson, of San Francisco, Cal., and F. A. Cutler, of Burlingame, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Joseph A. Brown, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. ■

¶3• Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.

¶4DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

¶5In all respects this ease is like Royal Indemnity Company v. Moms (No. 5824) 37 F.(2d) 90, and by stipulation it is ruled by our decision in that ease.

¶6Accordingly, the judgment will he reversed, with directions to take further proceedings not inconsistent with the views therein expressed.

/37/f2d/93 · .json · Public domain