Easter v. Endell’s Empirical Analysis
37 F.3d 1343 · 1994
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Batson v. Kentucky · Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Griffith v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“its operation must conform to the due process requirements of the 14th Amendment”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that failure to follow state procedures will warrant withdrawal of a federal remedy only if those procedures provided the habeas petitioner with a fair opportunity to seek relief in state court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'only a firmly established and regularly followed state practice' may be interposed by a State to prevent subsequent review ... of a federal constitutional claim.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.