Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

37 F.3d 1494

Docket No. 94-6691.

King v. Moore

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 25, 1994 Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-10-13

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ingram v. Baltimore Sun

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-10-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-648)

James W. King, appellant pro se.

Conrad Moss Shumadine, Amy Moss Levy, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Moore, No. CA-92-648 (E.D. Va. May 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/37/f3d/1494 · .json · Public domain